Precision does not settle the comfort question

TechRadar's Logitech Pro X Superlight 2 Dex review describes wireless 8K polling, low weight and a well-constructed body. Its reviewer nevertheless found the long, sharply contoured shape difficult to grip securely and some buttons awkward to reach. A fast reporting rate therefore did not overcome every practical issue during use.

Check the available adjustments

Logitech G Hub provides sensitivity profiles, axis adjustments, lift-off settings and button assignments, according to the review. There is no dedicated physical DPI selector, so a different button may need to be reassigned. These details matter when comparing high-polling mice: the software features, grip and controls can affect everyday handling as much as the maximum frequency printed on the specification sheet.

Evaluate lifting and button reach with the intended grip

The reviewer describes difficulty holding the Dex securely during lift-offs, with rearward balance and sharply shaped sides affecting their technique. These are useful observations to compare with the user's hand and preferred grip, rather than universal judgments about every player. Inspect the side-button reach and the feel of the main clicks as well as smooth tracking. A low measured weight does not by itself explain how a mouse balances when lifted or whether its controls remain comfortable during repeated movement.

Check software and endurance assumptions before purchase

G Hub can remap a button for sensitivity changes, set separate axis values and adjust lift-off behavior in the reviewed configuration. Those options help customize control, but remapping also uses an existing physical input. Decide whether that trade-off suits the game. The article gives battery observations from a limited testing period, not a full endurance result at every polling setting. Confirm the current specifications and price independently. The review's central lesson is to weigh precision together with handling, controls and power expectations instead of assuming wireless 8K support resolves those practical choices.

Try the grip and lift before relying on the light weight

The reviewer found the Superlight 2 Dex precise but had difficulty holding its sharply indented sides securely, especially during lift-offs. That separates the mouse's light total weight from the way the weight and shape feel in a particular hand. A sixty-gram specification does not describe whether the rear tilts or whether the side buttons are easy for that person to reach. The review also notes substantial skates and an extra covered surface option, with a preference for padded use. Compare grip, lifting, and ordinary clicking as physical actions rather than assuming that an esports-oriented model will suit every movement style. Attribute the reported difficulty to the reviewer instead of presenting it as inevitable for all users.

Plan how sensitivity changes will be accessed

G Hub provides several sensitivity slots and other adjustments, but the source identifies the absence of a dedicated DPI selector. A user wanting to change sensitivity from the mouse must therefore consider the supported remapping approach and the button it would occupy. That is a practical tradeoff on a model with few physical controls. The software also offers separate axis adjustments, lift-off choices, assignments, macros, and a G-Shift layer. Availability of many software functions does not create more independent physical buttons. Decide which actions are needed during actual play and whether their arrangement remains easy to remember. Test the chosen mapping before assuming the software's long feature list solves every control requirement.

Keep the review's performance and endurance evidence in proportion

The article reports smooth, accurate aiming at the high polling capability but also says the battery was not tested to exhaustion. Its observed percentage change during mixed use is supporting context, not a complete confirmation of the longest rated endurance. Charging time and the wired connection are additional parts of the ownership routine. The price comparisons also reflect the review period and should be refreshed before purchase. Compare today's alternatives by the features that matter: accessible controls, shape, supported software settings, and the desired radio or wired arrangement. The review demonstrates why a strong reporting specification can coexist with a mixed overall assessment when everyday handling does not suit the tester.